Korean Law in English
Laws › Framework Act on National Taxes › SECTION 4 Extinction of Tax Liability

Framework Act on National Taxes — Article 28 (Interruption and Suspension of Extinctive Prescription)

국세기본법 제28조

This English translation is based on the Korean text effective 2024-01-01. The Korean law has since been amended (current version effective 2026-10-02) — check the Korean original.

(1) The extinctive prescription referred to in Article 27 shall be interrupted on any of the following grounds: <Amended on Dec. 29, 2020; Dec. 31, 2023>

1. Notice of payment;

2. Urging or demand notice of payment;

3. Request for delivery;

4. Seizure (excluding cases where the seizure is immediately revoked on the grounds referred to in Article 57 (1) 5 and 6 of the National Tax Collection Act).

(2) Extinctive prescription interrupted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall resume when the period specified in the following subparagraphs expires: <Amended on Dec. 29, 2020>

1. Period of payment notified;

2. Period of payment demanded;

3. Period during which a request for delivery is pending;

4. Period until seizure is canceled.

(3) Extinctive prescription under Article 27 shall not run during the period falling under any of the following subparagraphs: <Amended on Dec. 19, 2017; Dec. 29, 2020>

1. Period for an installment payment under tax-related statutes;

2. Deferment of notice of payment, the extension of designated due date of payment and of due date stated on a demand note, and grace period for collection under tax-related statutes;

3. Grace period for seizure and sales under tax-related statutes;

4. Period for yearly installment payment under tax-related statutes;

5. Period during which a lawsuit for the revocation of a fraudulent act filed by a tax official pursuant to Article 25 of the National Tax Collection Act or a lawsuit for subrogation of creditor under Article 404 of the Civil Act is pending;

6. Period of at least six months during which a delinquent taxpayer continues to stay in a foreign country.

(4) The suspension of extinctive prescription due to a lawsuit for the revocation of a fraudulent act filed or to a lawsuit for subrogation of creditor under paragraph (3), shall lose its effect when the lawsuit is rejected, dismissed or withdrawn.[This Article Wholly Amended on Jan. 1, 2010]

‹ Article 27All articlesArticle 29 ›

Korean original (law.go.kr) · Get articles as JSON via API