The provisions of Articles 186 through 188, 190 (the main body), 191, 377, and 378 shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit seeking confirmation of the non-validity of a resolution on the ground that the details of the resolution adopted at a general meeting of shareholders are contrary to a statute and to a lawsuit seeking confirmation of the non-existence of a resolution on the ground that material defects exist in the procedures for the convocation of a general meeting of shareholders or in the method of adopting a resolution that no resolution of the general meeting of shareholders is deemed to have existed. <Amended by Act No. 3724, Apr. 10, 1984; Act No. 5053, Dec. 29, 1995>
Laws › Commercial Act › Sub-Section 1 General Meeting of Shareholders
Commercial Act — Article 380 (Lawsuit Seeking Confirmation of Non-validity or Non-existence of Resolution)
상법 제380조
This English translation is based on the Korean text effective 2018-12-19. The Korean law has since been amended (current version effective 2026-09-10) — check the Korean original.
For AI agents and developers — get this article as JSON, with the English and current Korean effective dates and an outdated-translation flag, from the korea-law API or as an MCP tool:
https://mcp.apify.com?tools=kr-data/korea-law